Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Blalock (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to United States v. Eichman. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:08, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Blalock[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Involved in notable events/campaigns, but doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Last AfD, in 2008, closed as no consensus. Boleyn (talk) 23:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I would say "redirect" to United_States_v._Eichman but in fact I cannot find Blalock's name in the text of the ruling, which is linked from that page. (The link on this page is dead.) LaMona (talk) 03:13, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 04:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – and redirect to United States v. Eichman. I agree that Blalock doesn't meet the criteria for a separate article, even under WP:ONEEVENT. There were many cases of flag burning and court cases around that time and he was one of a number of people in the cases. The problem is that United States v. Eichman doesn't mention him either, because it doesn't have a Background section. If necessary I will volunteer to write that section. There is enough material. For example here is an AP story, and here is a book with the statement of the ~~three~~ four protesters on the day when they were arrested. – Margin1522 (talk) 07:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am happy with Margin1522's suggestion. Boleyn (talk) 17:21, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – I have added the Background section to United States v. Eichman. I think it should be OK to redirect now. – Margin1522 (talk) 02:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.