Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dauren Mussa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dauren Mussa[edit]

Dauren Mussa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't access many of the references and those I could access either didn't mention him or had just passing mentions. There's nothing to show he meets the notability criteria for martial artists since having a good rank and heading an organization are not enough and I didn't find significant independent coverage of him.Mdtemp (talk) 19:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 23:55, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I also couldn't access a number of the references given. My own search didn't turn up the coverage I believe is necessary to meet WP:GNG. I also don't see that he meets any of the specific notability criteria. Some of the claims were also dubious--like winning an Oscar for sports (as far as I know there's no such award). I'm willing to change my vote if someone can provide some good sources to support any claims of notability. Papaursa (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 04:09, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don't see significant accomplishments or supported claims of notability. Jakejr (talk) 00:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.