Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datarati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Datarati[edit]

WP:NEO. Ghits: Datarati -"dat arati" -"datar ati". --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 22:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. OK, i will call it neologism rather than nonsense but it was made up by the article's author. Say no more. -- Sgroupace (talk) 02:00, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is great term to represent those of us data types that work in campaign optimisation. This should stay in my opinion. The datarati are an offshoot of a similar group of people who are also often referred to as the Numerati [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.110.118.153 (talk) 11:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:NEO and explain how this term is not a neologism or even a protologism. How much you and/or others like the term datarati is not going to factor into the decision whether to keep or delete this article. See also WP:V. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 13:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- fr33k man -s- 15:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NOT for things you made up in the office one day. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 21:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a recently coined term that does not appear to have spread in usage -- Whpq (talk) 16:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.