Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataArt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:34, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DataArt[edit]
- Non-notable Russian outsourcing company with 160 employees. Advert. Biography articles have also been created for various employees, which should all also be deleted on the grounds of non-notability. Tempshill 21:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Am inclined to agree, although mail.ru seems to have been notable in Russia (15 million users?). James Kendall 21:22, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete, advert. Probably a good idea to nominate the execs for deletion if this goes. Stifle 15:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
Johnleemk | Talk 14:17, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Johnleemk | Talk 14:17, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete per nom. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 15:10, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no clear evidence of notability.--Isotope23 17:37, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as advertising for non-notable company. OhNoitsJamieTalk 08:05, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Small company but well-known and notable for achievements, useful entry. Executive biographies non-notable, their insertion may be grounds for removal of entire entry?
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.