Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data-driven urban water management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:55, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Data-driven urban water management[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neologism for "if we had better data we could do a better job". E Eng 17:50, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:29, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:29, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:29, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article admits it is "novel" and only has one citation from this year. Wait until there is enough for justify a stand-lone article. W Nowicki (talk) 18:13, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete One paper does not an idea make. Rhadow (talk) 11:25, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A bit of a WP:NEOLOGISM in addition to previous comments. If the term ever gets specific usage, it would at best get fleshed out a little at another water management article, but doubtful ever its own. Kingofaces43 (talk) 18:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.