Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darul Uloom Amjadia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 13:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Darul Uloom Amjadia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The organization doesn't seem to pass even the WP:GNG, the most basic rule on notability. There are a few scant mentions of the organization's name as well as individuals associated with it, but nothing further than that. The subject thus lacks sustained coverage in any way. The "unreferenced" tag has remained on the article for two months with no progress made. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:11, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:23, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Eperoton (talk) 22:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.