Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darrin Drader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Darrin Drader[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I went through this and removed all the unsourced or poorly sourced information, and was left with only a two sentences, all of which are sourced to the vague "RPG Database", which isn't itself a reliable source.

Searching for him produces only one possible bit of information and it's an entry in a police blotter and that may not even be him. Jorm (talk) 19:58, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously Delete as nominator.--Jorm (talk) 20:08, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even close to enough sourcing to demonstrate notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:57, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I’m mystified by the police blotter. Can you share a link? Mccapra (talk) 21:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I honestly don't feel comfortable. I'm not sure if it's actually this person, and it's not an actual article or indication of conviction; just an arrest. I think it would be p. low class to focus on it.--Jorm (talk) 21:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and per the fact that the single mention I found describes him as a "former writer". AleatoryPonderings (talk) 21:47, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater@ 22:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 06:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because there is not sufficient sources, both reliable and independent. CambridgeGraduate (talk) 19:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.