Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren T. Holmes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular ^T · C 23:17, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darren T. Holmes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO, non-notable Alan - talk 21:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - (1) The nom doesn't say why. (2) This is a film editor elected to A.C.E. (3) No effort to use any of thousands of Ghits]. Rescue. Bearian (talk) 03:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Click Google News search at the top of the AFD. Apparently editors are listed along side the director and voice editors[1], so their work must be important. If someone has played a significant role in a notable film, then they are notable. Only a few of the films he's worked on are listed in the article right now, IMDB listing a lot more [2]. Don't they have an academy award for best editor even? Dream Focus 02:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: His film credits and the sources found above establish notability. Intelligentsium 22:35, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.