Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Sussman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darren Sussman[edit]

Delete Vanity page, clearly fails WP:COI and WP:N, has been tagged for both for nearly a year. MrShamrock (talk) 10:45, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

delete I am unable to locate significant third party coverage. Although COI and Auto are not enough for me to want to delete, and this is the creator's only creation, I do not see that the subject meets WP:BIO. One would think there would be more for the creator of Theatermania. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 16:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:BIO. Schuym1 (talk) 23:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete couldn't possibly fail WP:BIO any more miserably. JBsupreme (talk) 04:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per google news and straight Google. If the article is sent to cleanup, it has a nice chance of becoming encyclopedic with assertions of notability being properly sourced. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Those Google News hits are a start, but most of them are trivial mentions - i.e. they either mention Sussman offhand or quote him on the subject of the article. The company he founded might be notable, but he himself doesn't seem to have any relevance outside its founding. Graymornings_(talk) 00:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Should have mentioned this more clearly. I went searching for RS with V. All I came up with was trivial, non significant coverage. I looked through the hits Michael cited and found nothing. Might have missed something, but without links to significant coverage, I can't say there is any. Dloh cierekim 01:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.