Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darnall Hall (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 00:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Darnall Hall[edit]

Darnall Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns. There appears to be no meaningful claim of notability. The previous AfD listing concerns previous, unrelated content under the same title. UninvitedCompany 22:06, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 22:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Certainly a notable building in the city of Sheffield, both as a residence hall and as the later Liberal Club. StaniforthHistorian (talk) 22:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep The nominator has just AfD'ed eight articles created by the same editor. Please don't expect us to believe that this is about issues of "notability". Andy Dingley (talk) 22:24, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. The nomination here is legit - the creator was creating Staniforth family related articles - some of which are not notable. This particular building was of local significance (standing between 1723 and 2010) and is covered in a number of sources. The - book - has fairly in depth coverage.Icewhiz (talk) 16:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.