Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darksiders (series)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 03:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Darksiders (series)[edit]

Darksiders (series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unnecessary and redundant article. There are two Darksiders games: Darksiders and Darksiders II. This article just rehashes the information on those two pages, without any new information or general overview of the series (which consists of two entries, so there's not much to go on either). soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 11:22, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. As stated, this page is unnecessary as the "series" only consists of two games, and all of the information here is just duplicative of the information already found on the two games' own articles. The only sources being used are the reviews of each game which, again, is already included on the pages for the individual games. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 16:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Redundant since there are only two games in the series, and prospects for a third game are shaky at best.--Martin IIIa (talk) 19:52, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - The general consensus is that, at the very least, 3 titles would be required to warrant a series article. All info within this article is redundant to either entry it represents. Sergecross73 msg me 12:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is little coverage discussing the series outside of the two individual games. Any coverage falls under the scope of those articles so this is a redundant content fork. --The1337gamer (talk) 09:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.