Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark ambient

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments (oldid) czar 16:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dark ambient[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubious music genre article. Coin945 (talk) 12:20, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 12:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Withdrawn by nominator" per Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion#The recent music genre AFDs--Coin945 (talk) 14:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep per P-Funk and Trad jazz. Andrew D. (talk) 13:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No deletion rationale based on a policy has been presented. The article itself is clearly notable and sourced too. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 13:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It may potentially be notable, but the actual sources currently used in the article are not convincing. Three are dead links. 2 link to blogs. 2 seem okay, and then one links to a music interview where the artist is described as "dark ambient" without any explanation to what it actually is.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.