Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Systems BBS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --Shirahadasha (talk) 05:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dark Systems BBS[edit]
- Dark Systems BBS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Unverifiable article on a non-notable web forum. Declined speedy. 7 ghits, most of which are Wikipedia mirrors. MER-C 11:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Technically not a website, but the spirit of nn-web surely applies. When an article has to point out stuff like the fact that a local pizza joint advertised there, you know it's pathetically non-notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:07, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, but I won't go speedy. Well known by whom? Doesn't say even what networks they were on, and gave some of the specs that were used on the system. Near as I can tell, they were a node and nothing more on some of the FTNs, never acted as, say, a Fido hub. Notability fails, gotta go. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm sure it was a very nice BBS, but Wikipedia is not the place for original research. RFerreira (talk) 21:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.