Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark River (Warriors) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge (release date) and redirect. TerriersFan 01:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dark River (Warriors)[edit]

procedural nomination Despite having been previously considered at AFD, article was nominated for PROD-deletion. PROD nominator states: "This is purely speculative. There is nothing to prove it will be a notable book upon its release. The whole article is one sentence of facts and then a plot narrative (by the way, how do we have a full plot before the book is released?)"--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

D'oh What is the worst part of this is who the original AFD creator was.........yeah, that'd be yours truly. Metros (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability at this time. The greater part of the article is just a quote from the author. --S.dedalus (talk) 06:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge The information should at least go back to the warriors (novel series) page ClawClaw (talk) 21:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment there is no sourced information in here to be merged. In addition, all that would be appropriate to merge, if source, would be one single sentence. Metros (talk) 21:29, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Exactly, that one single sentence should still find it's way back. Too many articles have been deleted with none of the sourced info being saved. ClawClaw (talk) 12:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, recreate when it's published. Fee Fi Foe Fum 07:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.