Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Mousy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was close as improper forum as articles (the entire category of D.N.Angel characters, in fact) are already being discussed for merger. Please stop gaming the system, TTN. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dark Mousy[edit]
- Dark Mousy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of D.N.Angel through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so coverage independent of the character list is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 19:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. AfD is not for merge discussions, and merging of these into List of D.N.Angel characters has also been discussed and is supported and in the Anime and manga project's current queue for active work being done (and slowly being done). However apparently TTN feels there is some sort of deadline and doesn't feel actual merging is needed as he, once again, just did a wholescale redirect of all of the character articles without performing any actual merging and completing ignoring the existing discussion. These were reverted, of course, which is why I presume he is doing this AfD, the third one today for this series' characters. Why not let us actually do the work we are doing instead of continuing to interrupt on-going work! -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:21, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.