Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dare Devil (Gossip Girl)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sean William @ 18:46, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dare Devil (Gossip Girl)[edit]

TV episode with no claim to notability given. Does not ~~deserve~~ qualify for its own article per WP:EPISODE. Nehwyn 07:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article also contradicts WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information in that it is merely a plot summary. --Nehwyn (talk) 08:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Handmaiden's Tale,Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor, Victrola‎, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blair Waldorf Must Pie! and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seventeen Candles‎. And it's not a question of "deserving"... -- phoebe/(talk) 06:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. Inclusion is not a reason for notability, and this is an individual deletion; each article must be assessed on its own merits. --Nehwyn (talk) 08:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the compromise solution of merge and redirect is certainly the same for all of them, so I don't know why that can't be discussed for all of them at once. -- phoebe/(talk) 08:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Caknuck (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again: each article on its own merits. If a given episode does have something that stands out from the rest, it's welcome to have it's own article. It just doesn't seem to be the case here. --Nehwyn (talk) 08:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:EPISODE. Twenty Years 15:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, merely a plot summary. --B. Wolterding (talk) 21:57, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.