Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darcy Isa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keepNo consensus. Joyous! | Talk 01:15, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Darcy Isa[edit]

Darcy Isa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress, Few mentions on Google but nothing substantial, Has been in Grange Hill and Waterloo Road so redirecting to one of those would probably be best, Anyway fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 20:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Keep - She is listed as a character on the Waterloo Road TV series, and the main body of the article itself lists "Lauren Andrews" (the character she plays). --FuzzyGopher (talk) 21:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Being a character of a notable show doesn't grant one an article. –Davey2010Talk 22:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 2 cites to 2 bbc programmes, A character profile and some random homepage doesn't indicate notability and infact it actually proves my point that she's not notable and doesn't meet GNG. –Davey2010Talk 22:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not notable (a whopping four credits), and no viable sources. The BBC citations are merely episode recaps. sixtynine • speak up • 07:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per nom. Nothing in the sources found seems to establish 'multiple significant roles' in TV series or movies. No in-depth coverage. Gab4gab (talk) 15:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:35, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Having a recurring role doesn't automatically grant one an article and the character she portrayed doesn't have an article either. –Davey2010Talk 01:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.