Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daphne Barak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daphne Barak[edit]

Daphne Barak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article does not have any notablity and the page have very little verified information. That's why I think the article should be deleted Ominictionary (talk) 18:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:54, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:54, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Note she is not the Israeli supreme court judge with the same name ( and an Erez at the end). If she passes it would be as a jounalist (celebs and the like). I do not see it in a BEFORE, but I might be wrong. Article is in a very poor state, even if she is notable TNTing would do little harm.Icewhiz (talk) 19:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:01, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.