Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dao Thanh Oai line
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dao Thanh Oai line[edit]
- Dao Thanh Oai line (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is non-notable OR. The only reference is a 2013 self-published webpage hosted by Cut-the-Knot. Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 20:58, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as OR and failure of WP:GNG. Deadbeef 21:11, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I found no reliable coverage. SL93 (talk) 23:04, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:11, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I prodded this with the rationale "WP:TOOSOON, WP:NFT, WP:NOR" and have seen no evidence since to change my mind. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:06, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 02:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete obviously. Sławomir Biały (talk) 01:57, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.