Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dao–Moses circle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 16:42, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dao–Moses circle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Similar to Dao six-point circle sourced but only to an entry in a list; no in depth coverage and the list isn't a reliable secondary source. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 12:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for reasons already articulated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dao six-point circle. Sławomir Biały (talk) 13:09, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because no important,--Eightcirclestheorem (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Perhaps this should be deleted, but it will likely be rightly reinstated after a year or so. Michael Hardy (talk) 00:16, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think like Michael Hardy, now delete or keep is not important, but I think it is must on wikipedia in the future. --Eightcirclestheorem (talk) 13:37, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.