Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DansGuardian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep/no consensus; while it didn't get many people responding, the original nominator nevertheless withdrew his opposition, and that's good enough for me. Renominate if necessary. Ral315 (talk) 02:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DansGuardian[edit]

Vanityspam page for a severly non-notable censorware product. No assertion of greater importance made. Sdedeo 18:32, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Either Keep and severely mark as a stub, or if the vote goes for delete, Merge somewhere (either to SmoothWall or Squid cache or some more general censorware article). I don't think DansGuardian is non-notable; DansGuardian is one of the few GPLed censorware packages, is widely used, and is actively maintained. Not sure how detailed article you can get out of that, though. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 00:21, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Right - I expanded the article a whole lot. Hope this will be a little bit less deletable in this light. =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 00:48, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Well done. I think this version will survive -- it seems I was hasty. Sdedeo 18:38, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.