Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Walters (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 04:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Walters (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extraordinarily poorly-sourced article on a living person with no particular evidence of encyclopedicity and no reliable sources on which to base a proper article. I already stripped out a number of highly-derogatory and entirely-unsourced accusations/insinuations per WP:BLP but a quick check in the article history will show them. Once those were removed from the article, there is nothing left. polarscribe (talk) 03:59, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No indication of notability per WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:WEB. I can't find even mention of "Tourette's Guy" in reliable sources, unless you count Know Your Meme (which is pretty much the meme equivalent of Wikipedia). Incidentally, in my search I found a blog post lamenting the lack of an article for "Tourette's Guy", while the author promises to never use Wikipedia again because of it. ... discospinster _talk 20:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No available evidence of notability, specifically as an actor. Mcewan (talk) 02:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note - The article's editor has inserted personal information into the page - specifically, a street address. I have removed it and requested that the personal information be oversighted, as it is a blatant violation of policy and common sense to include someone's residential address in a Wikipedia article. polarscribe (talk) 02:37, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Tourettes guy is quite popular and is worthy of a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pollack man34 (talk • contribs)
Delete for lack of encyclopedic notability. bd2412 T 17:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.