Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Duncan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 07:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Duncan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was deleted under the title of Danny Duncan (YouTube personality), by the time I wrote that article I thought it would pass WP:GNG but now someone has changed a redirect page to a whole new article, the references are just YouTube videos of himself. Mjbmr (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mjbmr (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mjbmr (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Mjbmr (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@K.e.coffman Mjbmr (talk) 12:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have found no significant coverage in RS. Fails both WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER.Less Unless (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about him. Definitely a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 15:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I have improved the article somewhat and found plenty of other sources. I am just surprised that above editor "Barely found anything about him," Google news returns more info about him, including VICE and Variety. I am reserving my vote for now, until I do a little more research. Expertwikiguy (talk) 11:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just being mentioned is not enough. There have to be at least 3 independent reliable sources with articles fully dedicated to the subject and talking about him in detail. The fact that he blew up his car or gifted one to a random girl is not the kind of coverage needed to pass WP:GNG. Less Unless (talk) 18:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As mentioned previously, I haven't been able to find any WP:RS. Danny Duncan doesn't seem to meet. Redoryxx (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete despite the sources being some big names, the actual content itself is just crufty garbage and quoting him about his love of being a virgin, so blp1e at best. CUPIDICAE💕 21:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.