Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel and Jean Lautrec
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 22:27, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel and Jean Lautrec[edit]
- Daniel and Jean Lautrec (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fsils WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subjects can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline; all nontrivial article sources are promotional. No nontrivial GNews or Gbooks hits. Alleged identical twins who appear together in gay porn scenes under a host of different pseudonyms. PROD removed without explanation by IP without edit history. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article does not meet WP:PORNBIO.--יום יפה (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As much as I want this to be kept, it doesn't meet WP:PORNBIO. –anemoneprojectors– 10:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Above arguments show no notability. Wickedjacob (talk) 19:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.