Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Wu (soccer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 07:52, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Wu (soccer)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author deleted prod; fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. JTtheOG (talk) 06:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:14, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:14, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~speedy~~ as a (very likely) unsourced BLP; if ultimately sourced, still delete on GNG grounds, NCAA soccer players are rarely if ever notable on their own. SportingFlyer T·C 10:16, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:18, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Per SportingFlyer (talk · contribs). --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 10:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Unsure why @SportingFlyer and ArsenalFan700: believe he is eligible for a speedy? Being unsourced is not grounds for speedy, and sources are easily found from a quick Google search... Giant Snowman 11:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should have been a BLPPROD which was removed without adding a source, which is improper, but it was just a normal PROD. But it's fixed now. SportingFlyer T·C 13:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that was uninformed from me, saw no sources, one line, and thought that was enough for speedy. My mistake. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 19:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY.-Poppified ^talk 11:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - It is possible that there are some sources out there about him, a short search showed that he won the NCAA championship in 2019 with Georgetown, scoring a goal in the championship game, and was named to the All-Tournament team. I'm not convinced that he passes GNG but at least not a speedy delete. Alvaldi (talk) 13:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sonofstar (talk) 16:19, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, fails GNG and NFOOTBALL CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of any WP:RS addressing Wu directly and in detail Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 00:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Zackdasnicker (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.