Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Wayne Smith
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep; withdrawing nomination per consensus below. NawlinWiki 19:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Wayne Smith[edit]
- Newsworthy only as recently-deceased son of celebrity, nonnotable in my opinion. NawlinWiki 17:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Was an actor on the Anna Nicole Smith Show, a reality-TV program. Quatloo 17:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: If somewhat well-known especially for a celebrity's son, notable enough to at least have a short article. --Wizardman 17:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep at least for now. His death is certainly notable for the moment: a final decision on whether he should be independent or merged won't be reasonable until the circumstances of his death become more clear. Xoloz 17:52, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for now - apparently had bit parts in some movies as well - see what develops from this. bd2412 T 18:18, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep per above or failing that, redirect to Anna Nicole Smith (which is what we usually do with deceased people if their death only made the news because they're related to a notable person). --W.marsh 18:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP If all these other people who appeared in reality shows have their own entries here, and they are big fat nobodies otherwise, then Smith, who in addition to appearing on a reality show is the offspring of a well known celebrity, has a step ABOVE those others.
- Keep. If for nothing more than the irony of his death. Iamvered 18:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. NorthernThunder 18:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.