Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Twyman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker (talk) 03:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Twyman[edit]

Daniel Twyman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the general notability requirement or its more specialized version. Pichpich (talk) 20:39, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable source found. Only self published sources such as Facebook and few you tube videos are available. Not notable A.Minkowiski _Lets t@lk 20:56, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The reason this page was updated is because a produced and distributed film leads to a blank Wiki page with the name Daniel Twyman, so content with NO Links included, only info that can be verified authentic if checked, was added. All content can be verified as it relates to published and copywrited films and television as is seen on thousands of other accepted Wiki pages. There is no legit reason to delete this content. If links to reliable sources are needed, then please request updates to the page rather than deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Actormandan (talkcontribs) 21:32, 11 April 2014 (UTC) (The preceding comment was moved by Pichpich to preserve the format of the debate)[reply]
  • Delete. Roles to date to not appear to meet WP:ENT, and I'm not finding independent coverage to show that the topic meets WP:GNG.  Gongshow   talk 02:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subject fails WP:BLP which is an automatic delete unless an RS source is found. A Google search found nothing that even came close to ringing the notability bell. Subject thus fails WP:BASIC, WP:NACTOR and WP:V. That's four strikes. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:42, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.