Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Sergiacomi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 00:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Sergiacomi[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Non-notable, unverifiable, probably original research if not vanity. Claims "He is a local celebrity in the town of Bundaberg and is idolised by many young bass guitarists and by charity organisations alike." See also Wikipedia:Speedy_deletions#Daniel_Sergiacomi Melchoir 05:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable person, only 5 Google results [1] --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 05:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Right, I forgot about that. Anyway, only one seems to be him, and it's trivial. Melchoir 05:26, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:Bio. Feezo (Talk) 05:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- That too. Dang, I'm off my game. Melchoir 05:29, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Sandstein 05:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 06:40, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. School captains are not generally notable. Bass guitarist for a band that doesn't meet our musical guidelines. A search of an Australia New Zealand newspaper database comes up with nothing on him. Capitalistroadster 09:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article notable achiever in humanitarian efforts and the school captain etc. is just background info its not the notable facts. —This unsigned comment was added by Smithy 12345 (talk • contribs) 09:40, 22 March 2006.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 09:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nn. He sounds like a nice guy though. :) -- Ian ≡ talk 09:35, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
i think this si bullshit. ian is right, he sounds like a nice guy and like every bass guitarists deserves to be heard. —This unsigned comment was added by Nicholasaron (talk • contribs) 09:48, 22 March 2006.
Nicholasaron-delete him, he's a slut —This unsigned comment was added by Nicholasaron (talk • contribs) 09:52, 22 March 2006.
grady martin- i disagre daniel seems to be a great carachter and i believe more and more people should be able to view his heroic achievements —This unsigned comment was added by Nicholasaron (talk • contribs) 09:54, 22 March 2006.
Delete - Non-notable (despite the illiterate ramblings of his little school friends writing above) Maustrauser 09:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP keep him as a notable person —This unsigned comment was added by Nicholasaron (talk • contribs) 09:57, 22 March 2006.
~~Very Weak Keep~~ - Notable enough despite people abusing this forum they must be little school friends his efforts are example of Catholic charity in regional Australia —This unsigned comment was added by Smithy 12345 (talk • contribs) 10:06, 22 March 2006.
- There's no need to vote twice. Melchoir 10:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP Charity is not notable but it should be. This article should be kept because it is a young man who seems to be generous and charitable, those qualties are admired in my church and im Lutheran. Writemind 10:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There are many things that I wish people would publish commentary on so that I could summarize that coverage on Wikipedia. But we don't get all our wishes, do we? Maybe Sergiacomi ought to be notable, but you said it: he isn't. There is no evidence that anyone independent of him has published non-trivial material on his life. We have to delete the article. See WP:V and WP:OR for why. Melchoir 10:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikipedia is not for admirability, it is for notability. Joseph Stalin wasnt admirable, but he was very notable, and thus he has an article. Daniel Sergiacomi is very admirable, but as of now, he is not notable, and thus he should not have an article. --Pal5017 23:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, original research, vanity and non-notable. --Ter e nc e Ong 11:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn and very vain person. Eivind ^t ^@^c 16:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. NN / Vanity. Cnwb 21:55, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Pal5017 23:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, borderline speedy 'cos I'm not seeing any realistic assertion of notability. Deizio 00:19, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with a force five ~~hurricane~~ ~~typhoon~~ tropical cyclone -- possible vanity, and article's creator seriously underestimates the notability of a local celebrity in a little-known city in northern Australia. Haikupoet 01:38, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notebale, perhaps self promotion. Kyle sb 10:55, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. MSJapan 00:18, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.