Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Schwindt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:10, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Schwindt[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable political blogger. No coverage in independent, reliable sources, and all but a couple of his books are self-published. Joe Roe (talk) 21:41, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:17, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable blogger.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Subject not quite notable. Meatsgains (talk) 03:50, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - i came across this article when it was a draft and submitted for review. I knocked it back as I suspected the profile image was a copyvio, as it was used on the subjects Amazon and Linkedin profile. Either that, or it was an autobiography. The draft was then deleted per G7. Even with the suspect image removed, the subject clearly does not meet WP:AUTHOR, and if the draft had come up for review I would have still knocked it back. Instead of resubmitting it for review, in which the author would have discovered that the person does not meet basic notable requirements, the author has created the page in main space. David.moreno72 15:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.