Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Pinder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:33, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Pinder[edit]

Daniel Pinder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Props to Pinder's PR team for getting a handful of semi-reliable to reliable sources to republish the same press-release like puff pieces, repeatedly, about the same non-notable film. This article is nothing more than a puff piece/vanity spam and I seriously question the integrity of every single source that "reported" or mentioned his role in Chicago PD as being "significant" or "well known." I don't know if those are written by contributors or if they lack any fact checkers but I can find no real coverage of this role and even his own iMDb lists it as a completely insignificant, one time character, "Skateboard kid." All of the sources that have written about him are actually in this article, which doesn't leave me any hope that he is actually notable. More than half of the sources are about a film that isn't notable and are basically copied with a few words rearranged from the other.

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://web.archive.org/web/20181114184053/http://hpr1.com/index.php/feature/culture/local-actor-lands-hollywood-roles-and-he-did-it-all-from-fargo/ ~ Mix of an interview and independent reporting Yes ~ Local paper ~ Partial
http://cityonfire.com/daniel-pinder-joins-supernatural-thriller-sarah/ No Basic press release No Hobby blog, no editorial oversight or indication of oversight No Basic press release/announcement from a hobby blog No
https://web.archive.org/web/20181114183243/https://fanfest.com/2018/08/27/daniel-pinder-joins-garrison-7-the-fallen-cast/ No Same as cityonfire ? No No
https://www.nerdmuch.com/movies/158568/daniel-pinder-garrison-7/ No Per source, 2, 3 and probably several others. This is the same rehashed PR/announcement of no value ? No No
https://t2conline.com/daniel-pinder-australian-mega-film-garrison-7-the-fallen/ No same as 2, 3, 4 ? No No
https://herodaily.com/daniel-pinder-joins-garrison-7-the-fallen-as-role-of-kai/ No see 2, 3, 4, 5 No No No
https://youngentertainmentmag.com/interview-actor-daniel-pinder/ No interview No No No
https://www.entertainment-focus.com/film-section/film-interviews/interview-rising-star-daniel-pinder-talks-getting-his-big-break-on-chicago-p-d-and-teases-upcoming-projects/ No interview ? No No
https://diversionsla.com/paved-new-world-offers-brave-new-role-for-actor-daniel-pinder/ No blog No I question every single one of these sources' integrity reporting his Chicago PD role as "well known" when his actual title is "skateboard kid" No No
https://hpr1.com/index.php/feature/culture/local-actor-lands-hollywood-roles-and-he-did-it-all-from-fargo ~ Mostly an interview and PR puff piece ~ In general probably but in this case, for the same reason I said above, I sincerely doubt it's credibility. ? Unknown
https://www.senscritique.com/film/Dear_White_People/10839087/details No This is basically iMDb but probably less credible. This isn't coverage and it isn't relevant. No No No
https://web.archive.org/web/20181114190009/https://celebmix.com/daniel-pinder-set-to-star-in-movie-garrison-7-the-fallen-of-gena8-studios-australia/ No Just a rehash of 2-6+, the same announcement about a non-notable film series. No No No
https://web.archive.org/web/20181114191305/https://variety.com/2017/film/news/claudia-lee-skateboarding-movie-paved-new-world-exclusive-1202525729/ No Reliable but another announcement about a film, absolutely nothing significant or worthwhile about the subject. Yes No No
https://web.archive.org/web/20181114192208/https://variety.com/2018/film/news/virginia-madsen-valeria-cotto-supernatural-thriller-sarah-1202764656/ No "Pinder has been cast..." so very helpful. Yes No No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
Praxidicae (talk) 15:52, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails NACTOR, no notable roles. Reywas92Talk 18:16, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - does not meet WP:ANYBIO (no "widely recognized contribution") - does not meet WP:NACTOR (no "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.") - Epinoia (talk) 03:00, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:ANYBIO. Nice work on the source evaluation table. - GretLomborg (talk) 18:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I accepted this at AfC but didn't leave any notes as to why on this one. I have reviewed the sources both in the article and on the talk page and I can;t make a good case for notability. ~Kvng (talk) 01:44, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.