Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Pešta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Pešta[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Notability for artists. What appear to be ‘major’ exhibitions are in fact vanity exhibitions: Florence Biennale, Venice Pallazo Bemba, London Art Biennale, etc. The museum collections are not verifiable. DrAk Foundation and the Museum Montanelli are both Private institutions founded by his wife Dadja Altenburg-Kohl.

In searching for the museums, this is what I learned:

Only Reference to “Museum F. (Statues for a Baroque Niche, Klatovy, Czech Republic” is in his own bio. Searching without “Statues for a Baroque Niche,” yields nothing at all. No museum.
Museum exists, it is a historical museum, but unverifiable as to the collection. https://www.rommuz.cz/en/museum/about-us/
I couldn’t find any “National Museum of Posters, Mexico City”
DOX doesn’t seem to have a collection https://www.dox.cz/en/about-us Theredproject (talk) 09:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 09:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 09:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 09:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 09:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:21, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete most of the claims are inflated, false, exaggerated or of no importance, giving the article a serious verifiability issue. Vanity spam. Possibly (talk) 17:17, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.