Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Patrick Kessler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Patrick Kessler[edit]

Daniel Patrick Kessler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Several things about this, there's nothing for any applicable notability and my searches have found nothing better at all, the fact no one has cared to improve or also add contents to this since the nearly 10 years of existence also shows how it seems perhaps no one notices this article....With this, with there being nothing for any applicable notability, this certainly suggests at deletion material. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Unsourced bio. I've not been able to find any independent, reliable sources. Mduvekot (talk) 22:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete we cannot keep an article that has as its only source the subjects website.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.