Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Mossberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per Shawn in Montreal's argument (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 21:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Mossberg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable athlete + not referenced Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article lacks any form of reference at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:57, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing yet suggesting the necessary notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 06:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep first of all, this is an unreferenced BLP, so I would not have objected to a speedy or PROD on that basis. But since it's here, I see that the Swedish language Wikipedia article does have a one or two working references to reliable sources (easily readable via Google Translation). Moreover, while the sport of bandy hasn't mentioned on the policy page, it's close enough ice hockey that I feel like WP:NHOCKEY offers some guidance, and this person's participation at the World Cup level would help establish notability. Finally, articles like this or this took all of a split-second to find via Gnews, so I can only wonder at the utter laziness of those offering cookie cutter rationales such as 'nothing yet suggesting the necessary notability improvements,' when it takes virtually no effort at all to find them. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as again, Shawn in Montreal's evidence confirms notability. SwisterTwister, please look up sources and do not just vote "Delete", as you vote delete 95% of the time, normally with a similar rationale. Please actually think about the article and the notability requirements before deciding. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 13:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to above, worth note that WP:SPORTS states "sports figures are likely to meet Wikipedia's basic standards of inclusion if they have, for example, participated in a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level (such as the Olympics)." Since Bandy isn't in the Olympics, its world championships would be considered the highest level. While some argue that this means the Olympics only and World Championships do not rise to that level, this was some a bench-warmer, but the guy that scored the championship winning goal. Also, per the article about Bandy, it is the second most popular winter sport - even if this is a skewed perspective, this is not as if this is some obscure sports championships. In view of what is already found and the contextual factors, keep. RonSigPi (talk) 15:23, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.