Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Madland

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Relisted twice without any further comments, no consensus reached. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 05:23, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Madland[edit]

Daniel Madland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not independently notable – Broccoli & Coffee (Oh hai) 02:06, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:39, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:39, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:39, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Not quite sure what the nominator meant by "not independently notable". Sources are given the article, and unless someone more knowledgeable about Kurdish sources are willing to examine the sources more closely to establish that they are not RS, I would keep it as satisfying WP:GNG for now. Hzh (talk) 15:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.