Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Kamihira White

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. L Faraone 03:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Kamihira White[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional page, not having any luck finding significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. This search yielded the most results but none are significant IMO. J04n(talk page) 14:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 14:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-written this article only using information that is out there in cyberspace. I realise that most of the references are not the best but its better than nothing! I think this guy is notable and we should have an article on him; its a shame that he's not had much coverage from big news sites. I hope I have managed to save this article from deletion! ツStacey (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 04:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.