Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel J. Reiman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel J. Reiman[edit]
- Daniel J. Reiman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN. ttonyb (talk) 03:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not enough sources available to support an independent article. Trivial mentions and speculation are all I can see. Should be recreated if additional sources are brought to light. Jim Miller See me | Touch me 20:26, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 05:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete small town mayor who fails notability guidelines in WP:POLITICIAN as he has received no significant coverage in third party sources. Valenciano (talk) 13:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.