Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Gunn (ice hockey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Gunn (ice hockey)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG per only WP:ROUTINE sources. Fails WP:NHOCKEY by never playing in a high enough league and never in the top-tier of the IIHF World Championships, the only level that actually plays for The World Championship, the others are just for promotion relegation. Yosemiter (talk) 04:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:48, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Despite what I can only call the willful (and ongoing) ignorance of prod-removing editors who insist that NHOCKEY gives provenance of so-called "top-level national leagues," it never has done and does not do so now. The subject does not meet NHOCKEY, nor is there any evidence he meets the GNG. Ravenswing 12:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Amateur player who has not fulfilled any part of NHOCKEY.18abruce (talk) 13:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails to meet any part of NHOCKEY, definitely did not play in a top level league as spelled out in NHOCKEY. Also I can't see anything passing GNG. -DJSasso (talk) 15:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.