Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Greenfield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 00:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Greenfield[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources provided are not independent of subject. I was unable to turn up any independent reliable coverage of Greenfield. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. FuriouslySerene (talk) 20:48, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable sources in this BLP. Lots of people are "critical of Islam", so join the crowd. There is nothing that indicates that this blogger is notable. His somewhat common name precludes an useful and ordinary Google search. Bearian (talk) 20:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to locate RS material sufficient for GNG. No major awards. No widely recognized contribution to his field. Nothing found to support WP:AUTHOR. Gab4gab (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 00:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor 00:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.