Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Glenn Holt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 17:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Glenn Holt[edit]

Delete as a WP:HOAX biography Mayalld (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, appears to be a hoax, no evidence that the company mentioned in the article exists. —Snigbrook 15:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Clear Delete - There isn't a shred of evidence that this company exists/ever existed. A hoax in my opinion. Anti venin 16:42, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest Snowball Delete. The cited references are fake. The contributor is aware of this vote, yet instead of addressing the concern they just remove the deletion notice. - 7-bubёn >t 17:37, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:HOAX. Having the author see the notice and delete it also doesn't help to rectify the article status. —Archon Magnus^{(Talk | Home)} 21:17, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hoax, no sign that the company exists. JohnCD (talk) 11:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The information is both inconsistant and randomly changing. Besides, even if the company/person did exist, it wouldn't meet notability guidelines. LSD (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.