Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Burzotta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:MANOTE wangi (talk) 03:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Burzotta[edit]

Daniel Burzotta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial artist. Does not meet either WP:NMMA or WP:MANOTE with obscure competition record. More promotional than anything else. PRehse (talk) 15:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 15:40, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NMMA. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:34, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete He obviously fails to meet WP:NMMA. I was unable to find the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG. It is irrelevant that he trained under any of the Gracies. I can find nothing about the titles claimed in the article and no organizations are mentioned. The is no mention of him at the IBJJF website and he's not listed at judoinside.com. Therefore, I have to conclude that he also fails to meet WP:MANOTE. The article appears to have been created by an SPA so there may also be a case of COI. Papaursa (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.