Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Burnett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Burnett[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not appear to have received the substantial coverage in reliable sources that is required to meet WP:BIO. The only independent reference in the article is a specialist publication (MedCity News) which isn't of use for demonstrating notability. The best I could find via searches is some mentions in this Boston Globe piece, but again that does not appear sufficient. SmartSE (talk) 20:58, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am co-nominating the article about a company that the subject added, as it too has not attracted substantial coverage sufficient to meet WP:CORP. SmartSE (talk) 21:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TheraNova (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:10, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:10, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both -- likely a promotional walled garden. As an Adjunct Professor, the subject does not meet PROF and there's nothing else there. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both as lame medical device promotion and WP:NOT. From my PROD, "Fails WP:NBIO, WP:NPROF. Non-notable wrt Wikipedia, only routine business directories or routine announcements offered as evidence of notability." ☆ Bri (talk) 20:04, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.