Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Assef

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-11-25 23:57Z

Daniel Assef[edit]

Depending on which web page you read, Daniel Assef is either a Louisville,KY police officer, a Pepsico executive in Brazil, or an agricultural bureaucrat in Argentina. Whatever, he ain't notable. Author's Hbegg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) other edit was to an Australian boarding school... Tubezone 01:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well we can hardly say he doesn't assert notability. Delete, as a joke/hoax. Demiurge 01:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment D'oh! I should have said "not notable despite considerable assertions to the contrary" ;-) Tubezone 02:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete none of the Daniel Assef's appears notable. --Jayron 32 02:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete as a hoax and as failing WP:BIO. Crystallina 02:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. John254 02:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable despite considerable assertions to the contrary. Rever e ndG 03:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. User:Sd31415/Sig 14:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Speedy Delete per nom. --Wizardman 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable.__Seadog ^♪ 18:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom 0L1 Talk Contribs 19:12 25/11/2006 (UTC)
Speedy Delete I would have used {{db-nonsense}}. Article is wholly implausible, and given the dates of WW I it implies that he's at least 105 years old.--Anthony.bradbury 21:56, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete I can't believe this made it to afd. Totally agree with Anthony. bradbury {{db-nonsense}}.--John Lake 23:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per CSD G3 Hoaxes this implausible can be deleted as obvious vandalism. Jesse Viviano 23:35, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.