Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danica Moadi

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Danica Moadi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Danica Moadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article lacks the required sources for WP:GNG. IBG news and Nettv4u do not appear reliable, The Times of India is a questionable source per WP:RSPS, and BollySpice is a primary source. A WP:BEFORE only found social media and the like. I don't think the actress meets WP:NACTOR because she is only in small roles in the cited films. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 01:14, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @CollectiveSolidarity, thanks for your efforts for Wikipedia. To be clear, The Times of India is a questionable source when it comes to Indian Government related topics. Danica Moadi has done big roles in the cited films and a renowned face in Indian television & film industry. I request you to please do not consider this article for deletion. Jishan.JAM (talk) 09:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there @Jishan.JAM. The Times of India, per WP:RSPS is considered "...to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable. It [also] tends to have a bias in favor of the Indian government." Aside from that, the Times article appears to contain merely promotional material, as it says that Moadi is a foodie, and acts in the notable show Navya. However, she appears to not have a major role in the show, seeing that she is located near the bottom of the cast list, and WP:NACTOR requires that the actor have a significant role. The same can be said for the other shows she acts in, where she is also located near the bottom of the list. Aside from that, the sources of the article appear to be unreliable, or are primary sources.
To establish notability and warrant an article, a subject must have at least two reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject, per the WP:GNG. I could not find any reliable sources that were independent of the subject using Google Search/Books/etc. But if you can find any reliable sources online, please feel free to insert them into the article and save it from deletion. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 23:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @CollectiveSolidarity, I hope you're doing good. I've added more reliable sources as required. Jishan.JAM (talk) 22:53, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there Jishan.Jam. I’m glad that you found some sources for the article, and a reliable source (Indian express) no less! However, I am not sure that it is substantial enough coverage for the actress, because the sources you added are an interview (a primary source. Secondary sources are needed to establish notability), and the Indian express only says that she acts in Navya, but nothing else substantial that indicates that she merits a separate article. But I am known for making mistakes, and if others believe the coverage is substantial enough, then feel free to !vote against my nomination. On that note, where did you find those sources? I couldn’t find any. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @CollectiveSolidarity I found these articles on google images search.
https://www.tellychakkar.com/tv/lifestyle/my-most-expensive-buy-jacket-worth-900-danica-moadi
https://indianexpress.com/article/news-archive/web/a-new-entry-in-navya/
http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/danica-joins-navya-cast/783492/
https://www.tellychakkar.com/tv/tv-news/danica-moadi-enter-navya
But as per this, "To establish notability and warrant an article, a subject must have at least two reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject, per the WP:GNG. I could not find any reliable sources that were independent of the subject using Google Search/Books/etc. But if you can find any reliable sources online, please feel free to insert them into the article and save it from deletion. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 23:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)" I've added more than 2 sources.[reply]
I hope I've made myself clear Wikipedian. Jishan.JAM (talk) 20:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I’m sorry, but these sources are still passing mentions, and they still do not appear to be reliable. As interviews, they also do not establish notability as primary sources. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 02:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:34, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete fails ACTOR and GNG, a whole two hits in GNews, nothing other than social media in Google. She's had one role in a movie 10 yrs ago and nothing since. No reviews of her performance, not much of anything found. Oaktree b (talk) 01:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And why is "fashion blogger" and all her other career listings italicized in the article? Seems like she doesn't really do them. She's not a fashion blogger, she's a "fashion blogger"?Oaktree b (talk) 01:07, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Danica_Moadi&oldid=1105849398"