Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daneta Wollmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Daneta Wollmann[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite what the lede sentence says, she is not a US District Judge. She is a Magistrate Judge, a subsidiary official who hears the preliminary steps of cases and disposes of minor matters. There's an immense difference, Officials at this level have never been considered to be presumed to meet the notability requirements DGG ( talk ) 09:20, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree no evidence she meets the notability requirements Million_Moments (talk) 12:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete actual district judges are notable, magistrate judges are not. Don't get me started on how unequal our coverage of judges is between the US and Nigeria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.