Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing Turtle Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all three articles. – Joe (talk) 18:49, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing Turtle Group[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A web search turns up little mention of "Dancing Turtle Group" or its linked subsidiaries "Dancing Turtle Records" or "Dancing Turtle Films", let alone any substantial coverage of it. Fails WP:GNG, WP:CORP. Largoplazo (talk) 01:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are subsidiaries and suffer from the same lack of notability:

The three articles are by the same possibly COI author. Largoplazo (talk) 01:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:36, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:36, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all: do not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Corporate spam and an advertorial walled garden. K.e.coffman (talk) 13:14, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Dancing Turtle Records - I haven't researched the others. Normally for a record label I check for number of notable artists, but that criteria doesn't really apply for a "folk" label such as this. Instead, in this case I look for discussion in ethnomusicography journals etc. I can find no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources at all. The label seems to have no impact. Non-notable by any criteria. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:20, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree that all should be deleted, fails WP:SPIP, topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per prev. comments and no reason to keep. Redditaddict6 9 16:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.