Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Warrior

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Ultimate Warrior#Personal life. Sandstein 17:16, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dana Warrior[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Notability not inherited from her husband. Nikki♥311 22:19, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 22:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to The Ultimate Warrior#Personal life, which is where I redirected it years ago. I actually wish that there was enough material out there for an article on her because her appearances have become a staple of WrestleMania weekend since her husband died but I've done some searching and unfortunately there just isn't much out there about her.LM2000 (talk) 23:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yes I agree with LM2000, there just isn't enough evidence that she's independently notable. Almost all mentions of her are more about her late husband.★Trekker (talk) 23:44, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE or Redirect to The Ultimate Warrior#Personal life. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 02:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Ultimate Warrior#Personal life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.86.216 (talk) 03:47, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP Fmm134 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmm134 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why? You have to motivate your reasoning.★Trekker (talk) 01:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Ultimate Warrior#Personal life as above. 86.3.174.49 (talk) 20:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is the motivation for the redirect option exactly from all these IPs exactly?★Trekker (talk) 03:55, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Little confused by that myself. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" ^{Talk to me} 04:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The "motivation" is the same as everyone else who has suggested a redirect, because that is what the article originally was? 86.3.174.49 (talk) 17:59, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's all good but it's always a little suspicious when a several IPs show up and leave barley motivated non-delete opinion. Nothing against you specifically.★Trekker (talk) 18:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please Keep This article is very important, this is notable and just not a junk useless article. This all about the Ultimate Warrior's Wife, Who signed as brand ambassadress in past few months. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.134.98.184 (talk) 12:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to use actual arguments for why she is notable not just plead and insist that she is. PROVE it. Saying "please please" will not help.★Trekker (talk) 12:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Ultimate Warrior#Personal life.GuzzyG (talk) 02:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Think about it carefully, before takes quick decisions. Think more and one more time, otherwise this maybe helpful she was inducted to WWE Hall of Fame of his husband and his legacy... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.134.100.27 (talk)

What is this nonsense sentence even supposed to mean? We don't keep article in the hope that the person might turn out to be notable in the future. What's with it with all these damn IP editors out of nowhere?★Trekker (talk) 16:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please see, WP:USEFUL. "It's useful" is not a valid reason to keep an article. Nikki♥311 20:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Ultimate Warrior#Personal life. Per what LM2000 and Trekker said above, there's not enough material as a standalone article, if everything sourced there is her WrestleMania weekend appearances following the death of her husband. Nickag989^talk 19:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.