Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Rosendorff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dana Rosendorff[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marked for notability concerns since 2011. I find no evidence of multiple significant roles to meet WP:NACTOR. LibStar (talk) 01:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 01:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is all the coverage I could find [1]. delete for lack of coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough and relevant information in the article. Not notable enough. killer bee  05:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.