Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Ramos
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dan Ramos[edit]
- Dan Ramos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Politician, non notable before election, and has yet to take office, so has done nothing notable in office WuhWuzDat 20:57, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. State legislators are normally considered notable per WP:POLITICIAN. Since this person has won election, he merely needs to stay alive for two more months to achieve that criterion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:30, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. We'd just have to re-do the article in two months anyway; not sure what deletion would accomplish, exactly. Subject is notable under our criteria. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, along with all the other elected state legislators nominated for deletion. I added the template with the ProjectVoteSmart and FollowTheMoney links filled out - which SHOULD have been added BEFORE the election. I have no problem with these articles per se, but when they're little more than material from the campaign site while ignoring nonpartisan material.... However, I have a much bigger problem with WuhWuzDat's apparent attempt to make trouble (and cause everyone else a lot of extra work) by trying to get these articles deleted. Can we all please focus on our mission of being an encyclopedia? Flatterworld (talk) 18:33, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I resent the personal attack in the above comment. You have no knowledge of my intentions here. WuhWuzDat 20:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I wasn't born yesterday and I didn't fall off a turnip truck today. Anyone who creates a whole series of AfDs has some 'splaining to do, Lucy. See more general discussion here. Go ahead and resent what you call a 'personal attack ' - I deeply resent being forced to spend time dealing with this sort of thing. Flatterworld (talk) 20:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Despite your birth date, and whatever experiences you may have had with large vehicles hauling root vegetables, no one "FORCES" you to do anything here, this is a volunteer effort by all of us. If you feel forced, perhaps you have been spending too much time here. WuhWuzDat 06:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Following your practice, I suppose I should claim I consider that a 'personal attack' and threaten you with being blocked. Whatever. Flatterworld (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Despite your birth date, and whatever experiences you may have had with large vehicles hauling root vegetables, no one "FORCES" you to do anything here, this is a volunteer effort by all of us. If you feel forced, perhaps you have been spending too much time here. WuhWuzDat 06:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I wasn't born yesterday and I didn't fall off a turnip truck today. Anyone who creates a whole series of AfDs has some 'splaining to do, Lucy. See more general discussion here. Go ahead and resent what you call a 'personal attack ' - I deeply resent being forced to spend time dealing with this sort of thing. Flatterworld (talk) 20:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I resent the personal attack in the above comment. You have no knowledge of my intentions here. WuhWuzDat 20:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.