Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan O'Brien (comedy writer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 13:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dan O'Brien (comedy writer)[edit]

Fails to meet notability guidelines for people; also, vanity article concerns, evidenced by the fact that the subject created this article himself as a response to the creation of another article (https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1881436689414323085&postID=8415230829757651102&pli=1). Regardless of whether Those Aren't Muskets think "they're f***ing bigshots!?!", informing Fox of exactly how many "dicks they should eat" (http://www.cracked.com/blog/fox-can-eat-several-dicks/) doesn't justify using Wikipedia as the track for your "race to the top of glorious Mount Fame".( 123fakestreet (talk) 06:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is Dan O'Brien. In response to the above: Kudos to your research, but I assure you that I didn't create this Wikipedia entry, (though I'm flattered and psyched that it exists). I'm sure there's a way to check who DID create it, and once you do check, you'll see it wasn't me. I think we can all get to the bottom of this mystery together. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.171.38.166 (talk) 09:39, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 14:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - While there are some references to "Daniel O'Brien" in reliable sources, it looks like none of them refer to this individual. Notability cannot be established. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 19:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 05:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.