Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Mott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to That's So Raven. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Mott[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP. Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. No significant roles. SummerPhD (talk) 02:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to show. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:ENT. I don't think appearing in 4 out of 101 episodes even merits a redirect. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to That's So Raven. Not much to be found for this guy. Confusions in seraches becase Seth Green actually received a number of reviews of his character named 'Dan Mott'. Did find one weak mention. [1] Not enough. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 02:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete in lacking notability, although I'd be fine with a redirect also Corpx (talk) 06:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.